Today's Democrat and Chronicle editorial is wrong on two counts.
First, its main thrust is that taxes on the "wealthy" should be raised. The editorial states that polls show a majority feel that the wealthy should pay more. Really, a majority of people in a country where almost half of them pay no income taxes think that such taxes on wealthier people should be raised. Who would have believed that?
The D&C Editorial Board, like all good liberals, would rather raise taxes on the "rich" that cut spending to responsible levels and balance the budget.
The biggest joke is the reference to Rep. Gifford's appearance on Capitol Hill to cast her vote on the debt limit compromise. The editorial concludes with this:
"Ironically, as the fractured House of Representatives voted on Monday, who should appear but Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. A gunman shooting the Arizona Democrat in January prompted dialogue about the harsh partisan rhetoric dominating Washington.
It shouldn't be too much to expect that after these contentious weeks, Congress and President Barack Obama can find ways to keep future debates more collaborative. Fed-up citizens should remind lawmakers of that while they're home."
I must have missed that D&C editorial criticizing VP Biden for calling GOP Congressmen
"terrorists" who were wielding "nuclear weapons". And they must have missed the editorial by Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post that was published on the same editorial page today. The one where she likened the GOP to "carjackers" who were "holding a gun to the head" of the President.
The D&C has been reduced to spouting liberal talking points and shameless hypocrisy towards partisan politics. If not for Bob Mathews column in the sports page, I probably wouldn't bother reading the D&C anymore.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment